Significantly, zero statistically extreme differences in long-name orientation scores had been found because a purpose of playing with otherwise non-having fun with matchmaking applications and confidence period just included just what you will qualify as null or quick perception designs (d = –0
Response: You’ll brand new reviewer validate as to why he/she takes into account the last 3 months since the a way too quick screen? From our point of view, this timeframe is an acceptable compromise between one or two needs. I’ve detailed so it on the Means point (pp. 7-8, lines 181-190).
We utilized a duration away from 90 days since everything we believed a damage ranging from a couple of needs: To adopt current profiles when you find yourself nevertheless having a big enough test size. With prolonged timeframes, the definition of ‘current use’ try 
toned down. With a significantly more strict timeframe, how many most recent users wouldn’t be adequate to the implied research, because concept of ‘current use’ is misleading (think about the instance for people who request include in the final day and you will an extremely effective affiliate instead Connection to the internet from inside the the prior go out).
176-181 Pages/non-pages to the a lot of time-name mating orientation: « considered as quick feeling brands ». As the CI includes no, no more account could be called for. After that, this element of revealing might possibly be headlined separately (descriptive?), up until the regression is actually presented.
It’s dissimilar to try to determine this new sociodemographic and you may character functions off relationships programs pages (Castro et al
Response: Once again, we are astonished of the reviewer’s opinion. You will definitely the reviewer, delight, render a research in the as to the reasons don’t profile are required when the result is mathematically non-extreme? It is first statistical training you to low-rejecting the new null hypothesis (zero feeling on society) isn’t similar you to definitely affirming this new null theory. The new rely on interval describes the thinking that cannot getting discarded considering the offered proof. We simply cannot discard the newest 0 effect (that is why we are not rejecting new null theory), however, we as well as usually do not throw away most other thinking. We can’t claim that the following is proof of no effect, however, we have found proof of zero effect otherwise very quick impression.
Zero results can be taken in the outcome, elizabeth.g. 184: « short-identity choices ». The research are referring to the brand new SOI-R, that’s said to be an initial-title mating size, the abilities are discussing the shape.
Response: It’s certainly listed the email address details are making reference to SOI-Roentgen (look for p. nine, contours 233-234): « When it comes to mating positioning, those individuals playing with software showed large ratings throughout three SOI-Roentgen size ». When we assume an acceptable authenticity of one’s SOI-Roentgen (and there’s no reason to doubt about it, because the numerous earlier in the day publications have validated which size), we simply cannot select the dilemma of composing ‘short-name behavior’, primarily in case it is entirely clear that individuals are using you to measurement regarding the SOI-R.
Response: For us, it absolutely was unsure just what customer needs me to shorten. We discussed in the main text new Table step one. From our knowledge of what is actually a correct redaction from an effective manuscript, efficiency shouldn’t be simply demonstrated for the tables, and in addition effectively discussed in the main text message (elizabeth.g., APA Recommendations). Consequently, here’s what i did.
To your Regression: Very first, it appears to be weird as compared to Castro (2020), your analysis wasn’t included in here, and/or 2nd, that’s are than the overall performance.
Response: The analysis concerns we tried to address in the Castro mais aussi al. (2020) additionally the introduce manuscript are different, so the latest efficiency don’t have fitted in Castro mais aussi al. (2020). , 2020) than to you will need to determine if pages and you will non-users differ when you look at the mating direction.